Compass Chambers
Regulatory Defence Bulletin

19th March 2010

Welcome to the March edition of the Compass Chambers Regulatory Defence Bulletin. After a break from publication in January, the Bulletin returns this month with a round-up of developments in health and safety. The Bulletin, published bi-monthly, will keep you up to date with all developments relating to regulatory crime, in particular health and safety, environmental and corporate financial issues.

For further details about the Compass Chambers Regulatory Defence Team, please visit our website at:
www.compasschambers.com



SENTENCING SEMINAR IN ABERDEEN

Jamie Gilchrist QC, of the Compass Chambers Regulatory Team, will be presenting a seminar: “Health & Safety sentences: on the up?” at the Compass Chambers Annual Conference in Aberdeen on 6 May 2010. Places for the Conference, which also includes three further seminars and a drinks reception, are still available. Follow the link for full details:

www.compasschambers.co.uk/news.asp



H&S SENTENCING ROUND-UP

OOn 15 March 2010 at Sheffield Crown Court, Corus UK Plc, Europe’s second largest steel producer was fined £100,000 in respect of a breach of s.2(1) of the HSWA arising from an accident in Rotherham in which a mobile crane overturned. The crane operator, who had not received sufficient training, sustained only minor injuries.

On 4 March 2010 at Cambridge Magistrates’ Court, Anthony Hill was fined £3,500 (plus £2,000 costs) for breaches of s.2(1) of the HSWA and Reg. 31(1) of the CDM Regulations. The circumstances of the case, in which a worker was buried in a trench when the sides collapsed, were redolent of those in the first corporate manslaughter case to come before the courts in England (R v Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings Ltd, which was adjourned at Bristol Crown Court recently and is expected to come to trial in October)

On 26 February 2010 at Doncaster Crown Court, Rotherham Council was fined £75,000 (and ordered to pay £18,350 costs) in respect of a breach of s.2(1) of HSWA which resulted in the death of an employee who was crushed by a reversing lorry during road resurfacing works. The operator of the lorry, Brocklebank & Co. (Demolition) Ltd was fined £30,000 for a breach of s.3(1). The court heard that vehicle movements on the site were not sufficiently controlled.


Compass Regulatory Members:

Peter Gray QC
Andrew Smith QC
Mark Stewart QC
Gary Allan QC
Jamie Gilchrist QC
David Sheldon
Barry Divers
Steve Love
Susan Duff
Graeme Middleton
Amber Galbraith
Barry Smith
Yvonne Waugh


Compass Clerking Contacts:

Irene Mackenzie
Michelle Williamson
Grace Moran





To view previous
Bulletins:

January 2009
February 2009
April 2009
June 2009
September 2009

NEW H&S POLICY STATEMENT FOR FIRE BRIGADE

On 12 March 2010, the HSE published details of a new policy statement agreed with the Chief Fire Officers Association (CFOA), the Fire Brigades Union (FBU) and the government's Office of the Chief Fire and Rescue Adviser (OCFRA).

The statement, which aims to set out a “sensible and proportionate approach” to the assessment and control of risk in the emergency service has been published at a time when the issue of risk assessment by fire officers has come under intense scrutiny in Scotland.

On 5 March 2010, at Kilmarnock Sheriff Court, in the Fatal Accident Inquiry concerning the death of Alison Hume, the senior fire officer in charge of the rescue operation was criticised by the representative of the Hume family for apparently preventing fire fighters from attempting to recover Ms Hume from the mine shaft into which she had fallen. He apparently acted in accordance heath and safety requirements as he understood them and under reference to an internal fire brigade memo.

The Scottish Chairman of the FBU has stated that the new policy statement is not a response to the FAI but welcomed the new guidelines.

To read the policy statement in full, follow the link:

http://www.hse/gov.uk/services/fire/duties.pdf



DIRECTORS’ DUTIES A STEP CLOSER?

Private Members’ Bill introduced

In the September edition of the Bulletin, we reported on the recommendation of the Donaghy Report that new, positive duties should be imposed on directors to ensure health and safety. The DWP, to whom the Donaghy Report was presented, and HSE, are yet to comment on the proposal but the issue has been taken up by the publication HSW which is seeking support for a petition calling for directors’ duties. Now backbench Labour MP Frank Doran has introduced the Health & Safety (Company Director Liability) Bill.

Criticising the adequacy of existing provisions, including the self-regulatory guidance set out in the joint HSE/IoD Guidance, Mr Doran stated:

“My Bill will place a positive duty on all company directors to take all reasonable steps to ensure health and safety in all aspects of the company's activities-effectively to put them in the same position as all other employers and to remove a glaring anomaly in our health and safety laws.”

The Bill, the text of which will not be officially published until the time of its second reading debate in Parliament on 23 April 2010, is understood to propose amendments to the HSWA to introduce positive duties on company directors of the sort recommended in the Donaghy Report.

To track the Bill’s progress through Parliament, follow the link:

http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2009-10(...).html



CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER & H&S OFFENCES CAUSING DEATH

SGC Definitive Guideline published

In the November edition of the Bulletin, we reported the publication of the SGC response to the SAP paper on sentences in cases of Corporate Manslaughter and for fatal cases under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

On 9 February 2010, the SGC published its Definitive Guideline (SGC 01/10) for courts in England and Wales. The Guideline makes clear that fines for companies found guilty of corporate manslaughter “will seldom be less than £500,000 and may be measured in millions of pounds.” For other H&S offences causing death, fines “will seldom be less than £100,000 and may be measured in hundreds of thousands of pounds or more.” Importantly, the Guideline recognises the distinction, which the English courts have long-since reflected in their sentences, between cases in which the breach caused the death and those where such a causal connection is absent.

To read the Guideline in full, follow the link:

http://www.sentencing-guidelines.gov.uk(...).pdf

© Copyright Compass Chambers 2009

If your email address has changed or you would like to update your contact details, please click here.


kasia.pa.service@gmail.com.